Which States Have a Ban in Force?
- Maryland HB 895: since October 1, 2026; large food retailers and delivery apps
- Connecticut P.A. 26-64: since October 1, 2026; retail sellers and third-party delivery services
Which Bans Are Enacted but Not Yet in Effect?
- Connecticut P.A. 26-130: revised ban from July 1, 2027; retail and delivery, including group pricing
- New Jersey Fair Price Protection Act: from August 1, 2027; groceries and household goods
Which States Require Disclosure Only?
New York § 349-a requires a statement next to algorithmic personal prices.
Which Bills Are Pending or Failed?
New York’s One Fair Price Act passed both houses and awaits action by December 31, 2026. California’s AB 2564 died and Colorado’s HB 26-1210 was vetoed. More than 40 bills were pending in 24+ states in September 2026.
Laws Cited in This Guide
Since October 1, 2026, Maryland bars large food retailers and third-party delivery services from using dynamic pricing or personal data to charge a consumer a higher price for tax-exempt food.
Since October 1, 2026, Connecticut bars retail sellers and third-party delivery services from surveillance pricing: setting a customized price for a consumer based on personal data collected through technology.
From July 1, 2027, a revised Connecticut law bars retail sellers and third-party delivery services from setting a customized price for “a consumer or group of consumers” based on personal data collected through technology.
New Jersey Fair Price Protection Act
From August 1, 2027, New Jersey bans surveillance pricing for groceries and household goods under its Consumer Fraud Act.
NY Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act
Since November 10, 2025, businesses that set prices with an algorithm using a New York consumer’s personal data must show, next to the price: “THIS PRICE WAS SET BY AN ALGORITHM USING YOUR PERSONAL DATA.” The Attorney General enforces it, with penalties up to $1,000 per violation.